-
June 2026 (2)
-
April 2026 (1)
-
January 2026 (4)
-
December 2025 (1)
-
September 2025 (3)
-
August 2025 (1)
-
July 2025 (3)
-
June 2025 (1)
-
May 2025 (1)
-
February 2025 (1)
-
November 2024 (1)
-
October 2024 (1)
-
September 2024 (1)
-
April 2024 (3)
-
January 2024 (1)
-
October 2023 (1)
-
September 2023 (3)
-
August 2023 (1)
-
June 2023 (1)
-
April 2023 (3)
-
March 2023 (2)
-
February 2023 (1)
-
January 2023 (1)
-
December 2022 (2)
-
October 2022 (2)
-
September 2022 (2)
-
August 2022 (2)
-
July 2022 (1)
-
June 2022 (1)
-
May 2022 (2)
-
April 2022 (2)
-
March 2022 (1)
-
February 2022 (2)
-
January 2022 (1)
-
December 2021 (1)
-
November 2021 (1)
-
October 2021 (2)
-
July 2021 (1)
-
June 2021 (1)
-
May 2021 (1)
-
April 2021 (3)
-
March 2021 (2)
-
January 2021 (1)
-
November 2020 (3)
-
September 2020 (1)
-
August 2020 (1)
-
May 2020 (3)
-
April 2020 (3)
-
February 2020 (2)
-
January 2020 (1)
-
December 2019 (2)
-
August 2019 (2)
-
April 2019 (1)
-
November 2018 (5)
- Oracle row cache objects Event: 10222, Dtrace Script (I)
- Row Cache Objects, Row Cache Latch on Object Type: Plsql vs Java Call (Part-1) (II)
- Row Cache Objects, Row Cache Latch on Object Type: Plsql vs Java Call (Part-2) (III)
- Row Cache and Sql Executions (IV)
- Latch: row cache objects Contentions and Scalability (V)
-
October 2018 (2)
-
July 2018 (3)
-
April 2018 (1)
-
March 2018 (2)
-
February 2018 (1)
-
January 2018 (4)
-
October 2017 (2)
-
September 2017 (2)
-
July 2017 (3)
-
May 2017 (8)
- JDBC, Oracle object/collection, dbms_pickler, NOPARALLEL sys.type$ query
- PLSQL Context Switch Functions and Cost
- Oracle Datetime (1) - Concepts
- Oracle Datetime (2) - Examples
- Oracle Datetime (3) - Assignments
- Oracle Datetime (4) - Comparisons
- Oracle Datetime (5) - SQL Arithmetic
- Oracle Datetime (6) - PLSQL Arithmetic
-
March 2017 (3)
-
February 2017 (1)
-
January 2017 (1)
-
November 2016 (1)
-
September 2016 (2)
-
August 2016 (1)
-
June 2016 (1)
-
May 2016 (1)
-
April 2016 (1)
-
February 2016 (1)
-
January 2016 (3)
-
December 2015 (1)
-
November 2015 (1)
-
September 2015 (2)
-
August 2015 (1)
-
July 2015 (2)
-
June 2015 (1)
-
April 2015 (2)
-
January 2015 (1)
-
December 2014 (1)
-
November 2014 (2)
-
May 2014 (3)
-
March 2014 (2)
-
November 2013 (3)
-
September 2013 (1)
-
June 2013 (2)
-
April 2013 (2)
-
March 2013 (3)
-
December 2012 (1)
-
November 2012 (2)
-
July 2012 (1)
-
May 2012 (1)
-
April 2012 (1)
-
February 2012 (1)
-
November 2011 (2)
-
July 2011 (1)
-
May 2011 (3)
-
April 2011 (1)
Sunday, June 21, 2026
Oracle single session "library cache lock" self deadlock: ORA-04020
Following previous
Blog Oracle 12c single session "library cache lock (cycle)" deadlock,
we will look one more case:
ORA-04020: deadlock inside one single session.
Note: Tested in Oracle 19c
Open two Sqlplus sessions: SESS-1 and SESS-2.
Following trc file shows:
It is a self session deadlock because waiting session and blocking session are the same (0xb89008b8 17).
Blog Blog Oracle 12c single session "library cache lock (cycle)" deadlock contains more detail analysis on this behaviour,
for example,
ORA-04020: deadlock inside one single session.
Note: Tested in Oracle 19c
1. Test Setup
drop table test_tab;
drop table test_tab_v1;
drop table test_tab_v2;
create table test_tab as select 'ABC123' name, level c0 from dual connect by level <= 10;
create table test_tab_v1 as select level c0 from dual connect by level <= 5;
create table test_tab_v2 as select level c0 from dual connect by level <= 10;
create or replace function test_fun (p_x number) return number is
l_x number;
begin
select c0 into l_x from test_tab where name = 'ABC123' and c0 = p_x;
return l_x;
end;
/
create or replace package test_pkg is
procedure p1 (p_x number);
end;
/
create or replace package body test_pkg is
procedure p1 (p_x number) is
l_x number;
begin
l_x := test_fun(p_x);
end;
end;
/
create or replace force view test_view as
with sq1 as (select distinct c0 vc0, test_fun(c0) vc1 from test_tab_v1)
select * from test_tab_v2 v2, sq1 v1 where v2.c0 = v1.vc0;
create or replace procedure test_ddl_table(p_cnt number) as
begin
for i in 1..p_cnt loop
execute immediate 'alter table test_tab add(ks_c'||i||' number)';
dbms_session.sleep(0.1);
end loop;
end;
/
create or replace procedure test_ddl_view(p_cnt number) as
begin
for i in 1..p_cnt loop
execute immediate 'alter view test_view compile';
end loop;
end;
/
create or replace procedure test_exec_call(p_cnt number) as
begin
for i in 1..p_cnt loop
test_pkg.p1(mod(i, 10) +1);
dbms_session.sleep(0.1);
end loop;
end;
/
2. Test Run
Open two Sqlplus sessions: SESS-1 and SESS-2.
2.1 In SESS-1, run:
exec test_ddl_table(300);
2.2 In SESS-2, run:
exec test_ddl_view(10000);
After a few seconds, SESS-2 throws error:
ERROR:
ORA-24344: success with compilation error
ORA-06512: at "K.TEST_DDL_VIEW", line 4
ORA-06512: at line 1
One can check object status by:
select object_name, object_id, data_object_id, object_type, created, last_ddl_time, timestamp, status from dba_objects
where object_name in ('TEST_PKG', 'TEST_FUN', 'TEST_VIEW', 'TEST_TAB', 'TEST_TAB_V1', 'TEST_TAB_V2', 'TEST_DDL_TABLE', 'TEST_DDL_VIEW', 'TEST_EXECC_CALL')
order by status, object_name;
OBJECT_NAME OBJECT_ID DATA_OBJECT_ID OBJECT_TYPE CREATED LAST_DDL_TIME TIMESTAMP STATUS
-------------- ---------- -------------- ------------ -------------------- -------------------- ------------------- ------------
TEST_FUN 6236412 FUNCTION 2026-JUN-18 11:13:56 2026-JUN-21 08:37:46 2026-06-21:08:37:46 INVALID
TEST_PKG 6236411 PACKAGE BODY 2026-JUN-18 11:11:44 2026-JUN-21 08:37:46 2026-06-21:08:37:46 INVALID
TEST_VIEW 6236423 VIEW 2026-JUN-18 11:28:39 2026-JUN-21 08:38:29 2026-06-21:08:38:29 INVALID
TEST_DDL_TABLE 6236774 PROCEDURE 2026-JUN-20 09:30:49 2026-JUN-20 09:30:49 2026-06-20:09:30:49 VALID
TEST_DDL_VIEW 6236775 PROCEDURE 2026-JUN-20 09:30:49 2026-JUN-20 09:30:49 2026-06-20:09:30:49 VALID
TEST_PKG 6236410 PACKAGE 2026-JUN-18 11:09:46 2026-JUN-20 10:12:43 2026-06-18:11:20:14 VALID
TEST_TAB 6236945 6236945 TABLE 2026-JUN-21 08:37:45 2026-JUN-21 08:38:39 2026-06-21:08:38:39 VALID
TEST_TAB_V1 6236946 6236946 TABLE 2026-JUN-21 08:37:45 2026-JUN-21 08:37:45 2026-06-21:08:37:45 VALID
TEST_TAB_V2 6236947 6236947 TABLE 2026-JUN-21 08:37:46 2026-JUN-21 08:37:46 2026-06-21:08:37:46 VALID
select name, type, '0X'||trim('0' from addr) addr, to_number(addr, 'XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX') addr_num, hash_value, type
from v$db_object_cache v
where name in ('TEST_PKG', 'TEST_FUN', 'TEST_VIEW', 'TEST_TAB', 'TEST_TAB_V1', 'TEST_TAB_V2', 'TEST_DDL_TABLE', 'TEST_DDL_VIEW', 'TEST_EXECC_CALL')
order by v.name;
NAME TYPE ADDR ADDR_NUM HASH_VALUE TYPE
-------------- ------------ ------------ ---------- ---------- ------------
TEST_DDL_TABLE PROCEDURE 0X96A00E48 2527071816 2793044217 PROCEDURE
TEST_DDL_VIEW PROCEDURE 0X6B5A398 1801075072 2396118748 PROCEDURE
TEST_FUN FUNCTION 0X80CDF188 2160980360 2391147328 FUNCTION
TEST_PKG PACKAGE 0X88C948C8 2294892744 3673762546 PACKAGE
TEST_PKG PACKAGE BODY 0X737B9C48 1937480776 2937683311 PACKAGE BODY
TEST_TAB TABLE 0X70F1F1B 1894904240 1905210899 TABLE
TEST_TAB_V1 TABLE 0X71FAA968 1912252776 2228492516 TABLE
TEST_TAB_V2 TABLE 0X97BBD6A8 2545669800 580752620 TABLE
TEST_VIEW VIEW 0X70BF69B8 1891592632 1492527927 VIEW
To repeat the test, re-execute Test Setup at first, then make the test.
3. trc file
Following trc file shows:
ORA-04020: deadlock detected while trying to lock object K.TEST_FUN
with object handle: 0x80cdf188, which is TEST_FUN (ADDR = 0X80CDF188 in above v$db_object_cache output).It is a self session deadlock because waiting session and blocking session are the same (0xb89008b8 17).
Blog Blog Oracle 12c single session "library cache lock (cycle)" deadlock contains more detail analysis on this behaviour,
for example,
waiting session (0xb89008b8 17) = blocking session (0xb89008b8 17)
waiting mode (X) != blocking mode (s)
waiting lock (0x62d127d0) != blocking lock (0x83c3f830)
waiting Flags=[0000] != blocking Flags=CNB/PNC/[0003]
waiting SavepointNum=d56d7 > blocking SavepointNum=d56ab
waiting/blocking HandleIvd=6236945=TEST_TAB
Trace file /orabin/app/oracle/admin/testdb/diag/rdbms/testdb/testdb/trace/testdb_ora_323537.trc
Version 19.30.0.0.0
Oracle process number: 48
Unix process pid: 323537, image: oracle@testdb
*** SESSION ID:(17.58059) 2026-06-21T08:38:29.493117+02:00
A deadlock among DDL and parse locks is detected.
This deadlock is usually due to user errors in
the design of an application or from issuing a set
of concurrent statements which can cause a deadlock.
This should not be reported to Oracle Support.
The following information may aid in finding
the errors which cause the deadlock:
ORA-04020: deadlock detected while trying to lock object K.TEST_FUN
Short stack dump of current process:
----- Abridged Call Stack Trace -----
ksedsts()+426<-kgllkde()+1182<-kglLockWait()+2503<-kgllkal()+2030<-kglLock()+1426<-kglget()+297<-kqlvld()+851<-kglgob()+3504<-kgldpo0()+726<-qcdlgpo()+772<-qcsRslvPLSQLInvoc1()+979<-qcsRslvPLSQLInvoc()+96<-qcsRslvName()+676<-qcsridn()+115<-qcsraic()+431<-qcspqbDescendents()+546
<-qcspqb()+283<-qcspqbDescendents()+4286<-qcspqb()+283<-kkmdrv()+180<-opiSem()+2167<-opiprs()+528<-kksParseChildCursor()+524<-rpiswu2()+2004<-kksLoadChild()+5339<-kxsGetRuntimeLock()+2335<-kksfbc()+19863<-opiexe()+2982<-opiosq0()+4482<-opipls()+21173<-opiodr()+1264
<-rpidrus()+198<-skgmstack()+65<-rpidru()+151<-rpiswu2()+543<-rpidrv()+1281<-psddr0()+467<-psdnal()+624<-pevm_EXIM()+282<-pfrinstr_EXIM()+43<-pfrrun_no_tool()+60<-pfrrun()+904<-plsql_run()+752<-peicnt()+279<-kkxexe()+720<-opiexe()+31613<-kpoal8()+2301<-opiodr()+1264
<-ttcpip()+1232<-opitsk()+1908<-opiino()+935<-opiodr()+1264<-opidrv()+1094<-sou2o()+165<-opimai_real()+422<-ssthrdmain()+417<-main()+256<-__libc_start_main()+229<-_start()+46
----- End of Abridged Call Stack Trace -----
Partial short call stack signature: 0xce99135a9a693f97
--------------------------------------------------------
object handle waiting session sid waiting lock mode blocking session sid blocking lock mode
---------------- ---------------- ----- --------------- ---- ---------------- ----- --------------- ----
0x80cdf188 0xb89008b8 17 0x62d127d0 X 0xb89008b8 17 0x83c3f830 S
--------------------------------------------------------
---------- DUMP OF WAITING AND BLOCKING LOCKS ----------
--------------------------------------------------------
------------- WAITING LOCK -------------
----------------------------------------
SO: 0x66147068, type: LIBRARY OBJECT LOCK (118), map: 0x62d127d0
state: LIVE (0x4532), flags: 0x1
owner: 0xaefc0968, proc: 0xb8eebc90
link: 0x66147088[0xa5f638e0, 0xaefc09d8]
child list count: 0, link: 0x661470d8[0x661470d8, 0x661470d8]
pg: 0
SOC: 0x62d127d0, type: LIBRARY OBJECT LOCK (118), map: 0x66147068
state: LIVE (0x99fc), flags: INIT (0x1)
LibraryObjectLock: Address=0x62d127d0 Handle=0x80cdf188 RequestMode=X
CanBeBrokenCount=708 Incarnation=708 ExecutionCount=0
User=0xb89008b8 Session=0xb89008b8 ReferenceCount=0
Flags=[0000] SavepointNum=d56d7
LibraryHandle: Address=0x80cdf188 Hash=8e860340 LockMode=S PinMode=S LoadLockMode=0 Status=INVL
ObjectName: Name=K.TEST_FUN
FullHashValue=e7a045fef628c10c7c8dcf7b8e860340 Namespace=TABLE/PROCEDURE(01) Type=FUNCTION(08) ContainerId=0 ContainerUid=0 Identifier=6236412 OwnerIdn=49
Statistics: InvalidationCount=674 ExecutionCount=0 LoadCount=696 ActiveLocks=1 ActivePins=1 TotalLockCount=163897 TotalPinCount=163874
Counters: BrokenCount=708 RevocablePointer=708 KeepDependency=0 Version=0 BucketInUse=63688 HandleInUse=63688 HandleReferenceCount=0
Concurrency: DependencyMutex=0x80cdf238(0, 326246, 0, 0) Mutex=0x80cdf2d8(0, 1479323, 6, 0)
Flags=PIN/TIM/VER/[40002801] Flags2=[0000] HandleIvd=6236945
WaitersLists:
Lock=0x80cdf218[0x62d12800,0x62d12800]
Pin=0x80cdf1f8[0x80cdf1f8,0x80cdf1f8]
LoadLock=0x80cdf270[0x80cdf270,0x80cdf270]
Timestamp: Current=06-21-2026 08:37:46
HandleReference: Address=0x80cdf358 Handle=0xa0670d70 Flags=OWN[200]
LibraryObject: Address=0x903c0190 HeapMask=0000-0015-0015-0000 Flags=EXS/LOC[0004] Flags2=/CSC[4000000] Flags3=[0000] PublicFlags=NST[0001]
DataBlocks:
Block: #='0' name=KGLH0^8e860340 pins=0 Change=NONE
Heap=0x80cdefc8 Pointer=0x903c0270 Extent=0x903c00d0 Flags=I/-/P/A/-/-/-
FreedLocation=0 Alloc=2.179688 Size=3.976562 LoadTime=06-21-2026 06:38:20
Block: #='2' name=PLDIA^8e860340 pins=1 Change=NONE
Heap=0x903c0620 Pointer=0x80763550 Extent=0x80763490 Flags=I/-/P/A/-/-/-
FreedLocation=0 Alloc=13.593750 Size=15.820312 LoadTime=06-21-2026 06:38:20
Block: #='4' name=PLMCD^8e860340 pins=1 Change=NONE
Heap=0x903c0778 Pointer=0x955b7e68 Extent=0x955b7da8 Flags=I/-/P/A/-/-/-
FreedLocation=0 Alloc=2.554688 Size=3.937500 LoadTime=06-21-2026 06:38:20
------------- WAITING SESSION -------------
sid: 17 ser: 58059 audsid: 102774880 user: 49/K
flags: (0x8000041) USR/- flags2: (0x48009) -/DDLT2/INC
flags_idl: (0x1) status: BSY/-/-/- kill: -/-/-/-
pid: 48 O/S info: user: oracle, term: UNKNOWN, ospid: 323537
image: oracle@testdb
client details:
O/S info: user: U000380, term: WCLINBDOXKKDUGS, ospid: 6132:51788
machine: SYS\WCLINBDOXKKDUGS program: sqlplus.exe
application name: SQL*Plus, hash value=3669949024
current SQL:
alter view test_view compile
------------- BLOCKING LOCK ------------
----------------------------------------
SO: 0x87edd848, type: LIBRARY OBJECT LOCK (118), map: 0x83c3f830
state: LIVE (0x4532), flags: 0x1
owner: 0xa5f51dd0, proc: 0xb8eebc90
link: 0x87edd868[0xb8f018c0, 0x87e13a98]
child list count: 0, link: 0x87edd8b8[0x87edd8b8, 0x87edd8b8]
pg: 0
SOC: 0x83c3f830, type: LIBRARY OBJECT LOCK (118), map: 0x87edd848
state: LIVE (0x99fc), flags: INIT (0x1)
LibraryObjectLock: Address=0x83c3f830 Handle=0x80cdf188 Mode=S
CallPin=0x90ab9830 CanBeBrokenCount=708 Incarnation=707 ExecutionCount=0
User=0xb89008b8 Session=0xb89008b8 ReferenceCount=3
Flags=CNB/PNC/[0003] SavepointNum=d56ab
LibraryHandle: Address=0x80cdf188 Hash=8e860340 LockMode=S PinMode=S LoadLockMode=0 Status=INVL
ObjectName: Name=K.TEST_FUN
FullHashValue=e7a045fef628c10c7c8dcf7b8e860340 Namespace=TABLE/PROCEDURE(01) Type=FUNCTION(08) ContainerId=0 ContainerUid=0 Identifier=6236412 OwnerIdn=49
Statistics: InvalidationCount=674 ExecutionCount=0 LoadCount=696 ActiveLocks=1 ActivePins=1 TotalLockCount=163897 TotalPinCount=163874
Counters: BrokenCount=708 RevocablePointer=708 KeepDependency=0 Version=0 BucketInUse=63688 HandleInUse=63688 HandleReferenceCount=0
Concurrency: DependencyMutex=0x80cdf238(0, 326246, 0, 0) Mutex=0x80cdf2d8(0, 1479323, 6, 0)
Flags=PIN/TIM/VER/[40002801] Flags2=[0000] HandleIvd=6236945
WaitersLists:
Lock=0x80cdf218[0x62d12800,0x62d12800]
Pin=0x80cdf1f8[0x80cdf1f8,0x80cdf1f8]
LoadLock=0x80cdf270[0x80cdf270,0x80cdf270]
Timestamp: Current=06-21-2026 08:37:46
HandleReference: Address=0x80cdf358 Handle=0xa0670d70 Flags=OWN[200]
LibraryObject: Address=0x903c0190 HeapMask=0000-0015-0015-0000 Flags=EXS/LOC[0004] Flags2=/CSC[4000000] Flags3=[0000] PublicFlags=NST[0001]
DataBlocks:
Block: #='0' name=KGLH0^8e860340 pins=0 Change=NONE
Heap=0x80cdefc8 Pointer=0x903c0270 Extent=0x903c00d0 Flags=I/-/P/A/-/-/-
FreedLocation=0 Alloc=2.179688 Size=3.976562 LoadTime=06-21-2026 06:38:20
Block: #='2' name=PLDIA^8e860340 pins=1 Change=NONE
Heap=0x903c0620 Pointer=0x80763550 Extent=0x80763490 Flags=I/-/P/A/-/-/-
FreedLocation=0 Alloc=13.593750 Size=15.820312 LoadTime=06-21-2026 06:38:20
Block: #='4' name=PLMCD^8e860340 pins=1 Change=NONE
Heap=0x903c0778 Pointer=0x955b7e68 Extent=0x955b7da8 Flags=I/-/P/A/-/-/-
FreedLocation=0 Alloc=2.554688 Size=3.937500 LoadTime=06-21-2026 06:38:20
--------------------------------------------------------
This lock request was aborted.
Tuesday, June 9, 2026
One More Case of DBMS_ALERT deadlock
Following the previous Blog
One case of dbms_alert.signal deadlock
< in this Blog, we will demonstrate one more case of DBMS_ALERT deadlock.
Note: Tested in Oracle 19c
Open two Sqplus sessions: SESS-1 and SESS-2.
To repeat test, exit both SESS-1 and SESS-2, open a third SESS-3, and register a new alert to cleanup alert_1, alert_2, alert_3. Then repeat above test steps.
Two alert interests are inserted (registered) into sys.dbms_alert_info in the order of alert_1 and alert_2, both with the same unique_session_id: 0228CD530001.
When we register alert interest: alert_3, DBMS_ALERT first performs cleanup of not alive sessions by delete in default order: alert_1 and alert_2.
Whereas we frist send (update) signal: alert_2, then alert_1.
In this case, Updates vs Delete are interfered in crossing row order, hence Deadlock.
< in this Blog, we will demonstrate one more case of DBMS_ALERT deadlock.
Note: Tested in Oracle 19c
Open two Sqplus sessions: SESS-1 and SESS-2.
1. At T1, login to SESS-1, register two alert interests: alert_1 and alert_2, then exit the session:
exec dbms_alert.register('alert_1');
exec dbms_alert.register('alert_2');
exit;
2. At T2, re-login to SESS-1 (sid: 552), check two registered names:
-- watch two registered names, whose session is not alive.
select * from sys.dbms_alert_info where name like 'ALERT%';
NAME SID CHANGED MESSAGE
--------------- --------------- ---------- ---------------
ALERT_1 0228CD530001 N
ALERT_2 0228CD530001 N
-- determines if the specified session is active.
declare
l_unique_sid varchar2(30) := '0228CD530001';
begin
if not dbms_session.is_session_alive(l_unique_sid) then
dbms_output.put_line('Not Alive: (sid: ' ||to_number(substr(l_unique_sid, 1, 4), 'XXXX')||
', serial#: '||to_number(substr(l_unique_sid, 5, 4), 'XXXX')||
', inst: '||to_number(substr(l_unique_sid, 9, 4), 'XXXX')||')');
end if;
end;
/
Not Alive: (sid: 552, serial#: 52563, inst: 1)
3. At T3, continue in SESS-1, send signal: alert_2
SQL (sid:552) > exec dbms_alert.signal('alert_2', 'alert_msg_2');
4. At T4, login to SESS-2 (sid: 16), register one alert interests: alert_3
SQL (sid:16) > exec dbms_alert.register('alert_3');
--Note that this call is with default cleanup = true to perform cleanup of any extant orphaned pipes.
5. At T5, in SESS-1, check TX lock, SESS-2 (sid:16) is blocked by SESS-1 (sid: 552)
SQL (sid:552) > select * from v$lock where type = 'TX';
ADDR KADDR SID TY ID1 ID2 LMODE REQUEST CTIME BLOCK CON_ID
---------------- ---------------- ---- -- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
00000000B4310970 00000000B43109A0 16 TX 5505024 782554 0 6 132 0 0
00000000ADB30E70 00000000ADB30EA8 552 TX 5505024 782554 6 0 169 1 0
00000000ADBCFAB8 00000000ADBCFAF0 16 TX 6291482 236621 6 0 132 0 0
3 rows selected.
6. At T6, in SESS-1, send signal: alert_1
SQL (sid:552) > exec dbms_alert.signal('alert_1', 'alert_msg_1');
7. Both sessions throw ORA-00060
SQL (sid:16) > exec dbms_alert.register('alert_3');
BEGIN dbms_alert.register('alert_3'); END;
*
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-00060: deadlock detected while waiting for resource
ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_ALERT", line 82
ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_ALERT", line 82
ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_ALERT", line 103
ORA-06512: at line 1
SQL (sid:552) > exec dbms_alert.signal('alert_1', 'alert_msg_1');
BEGIN dbms_alert.signal('alert_1', 'alert_msg_1'); END;
*
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-00060: deadlock detected while waiting for resource
ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_ALERT", line 431
ORA-06512: at line 1
8. Both Deadlock trc files:
=================== testdb_ora_1851008.trc ===================
Unix process pid: 1851008, image: oracle@testdb
*** SESSION ID:(16.33150) 2026-06-09T15:35:47.444358+02:00
Deadlock graph:
------------Blocker(s)----------- ------------Waiter(s)------------
Resource Name process session holds waits serial process session holds waits serial
TX-0060001A-00039C4D-00000000-00000000 66 16 X 33150 63 552 X 57779
TX-00540000-000BF0DA-00000000-00000000 63 552 X 57779 66 16 X 33150
----- Information for waiting sessions -----
Session 16:
Holds resource TX-0060001A-00039C4D-00000000-00000000 acquired 204 seconds ago.
sid: 16 ser: 33150 audsid: 131915016 user: 0/SYS
flags: (0x41) USR/- flags2: (0x40009) -/-/INC
flags_idl: (0x1) status: BSY/-/-/- kill: -/-/-/-
pid: 66 O/S info: user: oracle, term: UNKNOWN, ospid: 1851008
image: oracle@testdb
client details:
O/S info: user: U000380, term: WCLINBDOXKKDUGS, ospid: 42636:42136
machine: SYS\WCLINBDOXKKDUGS program: sqlplus.exe
application name: SQL*Plus, hash value=3669949024
current SQL:
DELETE DBMS_ALERT_INFO WHERE SID = :B1
Session 552:
Holds resource TX-00540000-000BF0DA-00000000-00000000 acquired 241 seconds ago.
sid: 552 ser: 57779 audsid: 131915017 user: 0/SYS
flags: (0x41) USR/- flags2: (0x40009) -/-/INC
flags_idl: (0x1) status: BSY/-/-/- kill: -/-/-/-
pid: 63 O/S info: user: oracle, term: UNKNOWN, ospid: 1851016
image: oracle@testdb
client details:
O/S info: user: U000380, term: WCLINBDOXKKDUGS, ospid: 57408:55064
machine: SYS\WCLINBDOXKKDUGS program: sqlplus.exe
application name: SQL*Plus, hash value=3669949024
current SQL:
UPDATE DBMS_ALERT_INFO SET CHANGED = 'Y', MESSAGE = :B2 WHERE NAME = UPPER(:B1 )
session 16: DID 0001-0042-0000011E session 552: DID 0001-003F-000005CF
session 552: DID 0001-003F-000005CF session 16: DID 0001-0042-0000011E
Rows waited on:
Session 16: obj - rowid = 003C067C - AAPAZ8AG+AAAXuhAAC
(dictionary objn - 3933820, file - 446, block - 97185, slot - 2)
Session 552: obj - rowid = 003C067C - AAPAZ8AG+AAAXuhAAB
(dictionary objn - 3933820, file - 446, block - 97185, slot - 1)
=================== testdb_ora_1851016.trc ===================
Unix process pid: 1851016, image: oracle@testdb
*** SESSION ID:(552.57779) 2026-06-09T15:35:50.836313+02:00
Deadlock graph:
------------Blocker(s)----------- ------------Waiter(s)------------
Resource Name process session holds waits serial process session holds waits serial
TX-00540000-000BF0DA-00000000-00000000 63 552 X 57779 61 196 X 9237
TX-005B0001-000BE24C-00000000-00000000 61 196 X 9237 63 552 X 57779
----- Information for waiting sessions -----
Session 552:
Holds resource TX-00540000-000BF0DA-00000000-00000000 acquired 245 seconds ago.
sid: 552 ser: 57779 audsid: 131915017 user: 0/SYS
flags: (0x41) USR/- flags2: (0x40009) -/-/INC
flags_idl: (0x1) status: BSY/-/-/- kill: -/-/-/-
pid: 63 O/S info: user: oracle, term: UNKNOWN, ospid: 1851016
image: oracle@testdb
client details:
O/S info: user: U000380, term: WCLINBDOXKKDUGS, ospid: 57408:55064
machine: SYS\WCLINBDOXKKDUGS program: sqlplus.exe
application name: SQL*Plus, hash value=3669949024
current SQL:
UPDATE DBMS_ALERT_INFO SET CHANGED = 'Y', MESSAGE = :B2 WHERE NAME = UPPER(:B1 )
Session 196:
Holds resource TX-005B0001-000BE24C-00000000-00000000 acquired 3 seconds ago.
sid: 196 ser: 9237 audsid: 131915018 user: 0/SYS
flags: (0x10041) USR/- flags2: (0x40009) -/-/INC
flags_idl: (0x1) status: BSY/-/-/- kill: -/-/-/-
pid: 61 O/S info: user: oracle, term: UNKNOWN, ospid: 1850047
image: oracle@testdb (J006)
client details:
O/S info: user: oracle, term: UNKNOWN, ospid: 1850047
machine: testdb program: oracle@testdb (J006)
application name: task-911-2 hash value=1117638710
action name: bgp: loop: init, hash value=2828460256
current SQL:
DELETE DBMS_ALERT_INFO WHERE SID = :B1
session 552: DID 0001-003F-000005CF session 196: DID 0001-003D-000004C1
session 196: DID 0001-003D-000004C1 session 552: DID 0001-003F-000005CF
Rows waited on:
Session 552: obj - rowid = 003C067C - AAPAZ8AG+AAAXuhAAB
(dictionary objn - 3933820, file - 446, block - 97185, slot - 1)
Session 196: obj - rowid = 003C067C - AAPAZ8AG+AAAXuhAAC
(dictionary objn - 3933820, file - 446, block - 97185, slot - 2)
9. Repeat Test
To repeat test, exit both SESS-1 and SESS-2, open a third SESS-3, and register a new alert to cleanup alert_1, alert_2, alert_3. Then repeat above test steps.
exec dbms_alert.register('alert_other');
10. Reasoning
Two alert interests are inserted (registered) into sys.dbms_alert_info in the order of alert_1 and alert_2, both with the same unique_session_id: 0228CD530001.
When we register alert interest: alert_3, DBMS_ALERT first performs cleanup of not alive sessions by delete in default order: alert_1 and alert_2.
Whereas we frist send (update) signal: alert_2, then alert_1.
In this case, Updates vs Delete are interfered in crossing row order, hence Deadlock.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)